<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Pool Full Of Pudding...</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rough-equivalents.com/2008/04/a-pool-full-of-pudding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rough-equivalents.com/2008/04/a-pool-full-of-pudding/</link>
	<description>Making Numbers Fun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 03:32:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DFS</title>
		<link>http://www.rough-equivalents.com/2008/04/a-pool-full-of-pudding/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>DFS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 06:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rough-equivalents.com/?p=11#comment-200</guid>
		<description>In the words of the beloved Darwin: &quot;Can you swim in pudding?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the words of the beloved Darwin: "Can you swim in pudding?"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rough Equivalents &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pecks of Pickled Peppers</title>
		<link>http://www.rough-equivalents.com/2008/04/a-pool-full-of-pudding/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Rough Equivalents &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pecks of Pickled Peppers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 07:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rough-equivalents.com/?p=11#comment-13</guid>
		<description>[...] Olympic sized pool that holds 2500 cubic meters of water, would hold 139,902,607 pickled jalapenos (283,778.10822 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Olympic sized pool that holds 2500 cubic meters of water, would hold 139,902,607 pickled jalapenos (283,778.10822 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Bulmash</title>
		<link>http://www.rough-equivalents.com/2008/04/a-pool-full-of-pudding/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Bulmash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rough-equivalents.com/?p=11#comment-10</guid>
		<description>So I was looking at the Google searches that came in yesterday and one directed at this page was for the volume of an olympic-size pool in cubic feet.  I thought I&#039;d post the answer in case any more such queries came in.

Since the volume is 2,500 cubic meters, multiply that by roughly 35.314 cubic feet per meter for 88,285 cubic feet of volume (give or take).  If you actually do it by cubing 39.37 cubic inches, then dividing by 12 inches cubed, then multiplying that by 2500, you get 88,286.1371 cubic feet.  But 88,285 is a nice round number that will work for most purposes.

-- Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I was looking at the Google searches that came in yesterday and one directed at this page was for the volume of an olympic-size pool in cubic feet.  I thought I'd post the answer in case any more such queries came in.</p>
<p>Since the volume is 2,500 cubic meters, multiply that by roughly 35.314 cubic feet per meter for 88,285 cubic feet of volume (give or take).  If you actually do it by cubing 39.37 cubic inches, then dividing by 12 inches cubed, then multiplying that by 2500, you get 88,286.1371 cubic feet.  But 88,285 is a nice round number that will work for most purposes.</p>
<p>-- Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
